نقش واسطه ای صمیمیت در رابطه بین الگوهای ارتباطی و کیفیت زندگی زناشویی

نویسندگان

1 باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت.

2 دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران

چکیده

هدف: این پژوهش در پی تبیین نقش واسطه­ای صمیمیت در رابطه بین الگو­های ارتباطی و کیفیت زندگی زناشویی است. روش: اینپژوهش توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی معلمان متاهل شهرستان مرودشت بود که 303 نفر ( 162زن و 141مرد) از آن ها به شیوه خوشه­ای تک مرحله­ای انتخاب شدند. در این پژوهش از پرسش نامه کیفیت زندگی سازمان بهداشت جهانی (1998)، الگو­های ارتباطی کریستین – سالاوی (1984) و صمیمیت زوجین ووندون بروک و هانس برتمن (1995) استفاده شد. داده ها در دو سطح آمار توصیفی (میانگین و انحراف استاندارد) و آمار استنباطی (ماتریس همبستگی، تحلیل رگرسیون، و تحلیل مسیر) مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته­ها: نشان دادند که الگوی ارتباطی اجتنابی نتوانست کیفیت (874/0p<) و صمیمیت زناشویی(135/0p<) را متاثر کند. هم چنین، توقع زن و توقع مرد با صمیمیت (314/0-) و کیفیت زناشویی (208/0-) رابطه منفی داشت. الگوی توقع زن تاثیری در صمیمیت زوجین (904/0p<) نداشت، اما تاثیر منفی بر کیفیت رابطه زناشویی (046/0p<) به گونه مستقیم داشت و اما توقع مرد به صورت مستقیم بر صمیمیت (022/0p<) اثر داشت و به صورت غیر­مستقیم و با واسطه صمیمیت در کیفیت رابطه زناشویی (058/0-) تاثیر منفی داشت. در نهایت، الگوی سازنده متقابل توانست صمیمیت (001/0p<) را به گونه مستقیم و کیفیت زندگی زناشویی را با واسطه صمیمیت (234/0) به گونه غیر­مستقیم متاثر کند. نتیجه­گیری: نتایج حاکی از آن بود که کیفیت زندگی زوجین تحت تاثیر مستقیم و غیر­مستقیم الگو­های ارتباطی زوجین از راه واسطه­گری صمیمیت است. گفتنی است با افزایش صمیمیت در میان زوجین تاثیر الگو­های مخرب توقع زن و مرد بر کیفیت روابط زناشویی کم تر شده و تاثیر الگوی سازنده ارتباط بیش تر می­شود و بر عکس.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Meditating Role of Intimacy in the Association between Communication Patterns and Quality of Married Life

نویسندگان [English]

  • esmail Barzegar 1
  • siamak Samani 2
چکیده [English]

The present study aims to explain the meditating role of intimacy in the association between communication patterns and quality of married life. The research method was descriptive-correlation. The populations of the study included all married teachers of Marvdasht City from whom 303 individuals (162 Females and 141 Males) were selected through single-stage clusters. In this study, The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL), Christense-Salavi communication pattern (1984) and Marital Intimacy (Van den Broek and Hans Bratman, 1995) are used. In addition data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software and in two statistical levels, descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (correlation matrix, multivariate regression analysis and path analysis).The results showed that the avoidance communication pattern cannot affect the quality (p<0/874) and intimacy(p<0/135) of marriage. In addition, the demands of husband and wife are negatively associated with quality (-0/314) and intimacy (-0/208) of marriage. The wives’ pattern of demand does not influence intimacy of the couple (p<0/904) but affects the quality of marriage(p<0/046)in a negative and direct manner. However, the husbands’ demands affect intimacy directly(p<0/022) but they influence the quality of marriage(-0/058) in an indirect and negative manner. Finally, the mutual constructive pattern can influence intimacy directly(p<0/001) and quality of marriage indirectly through intimacy(-0/234). It can be concluded that the quality of life for couples directly and indirectly is affected by their communication patterns through meditating role of intimacy. It should be noted that with increased intimacy among couples, the effect of destructive patterns of demand for husband and wife on marital quality decreases and the influence of constructive pattern of relationship increases. The opposite is also the case.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Communication Patterns
  • Intimacy
  • Marital Quality of Life
-Asadi, M. Nazari, A. & Sanaizaker, B. (2009). Effects of short-term family therapy Satyr on couples communication patterns. Research in psychological health, 3(1):65-76.(In persion)
-Asoudeh, M. & Zaerpoor, M. (2011).Mental health,role of marital intimacy and communication patterns. Second National Conference on Psychology - family Psychology of  Marvedasht. (In persion)
-Ayles, C. (2004). Biographical Determinates of Marital Quality. Available From:http://www.oneplusone.org.uk/Publications/Reports/BiographicalDeterminants_FullReport.pdf.Accessed 2008.
-Beachkosky, A.L. (2009). Marital satisfaction: Ideal versus real mate .Adissertition presented to the school of graduat studies department of communication disorder and counseling , school , and , education on psychology . Indian state university.
-Bodenmann, G. & Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stabledistressedand separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinalstudy. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71−89.
-Cutler, L. (2009). The study of aduit attachment styles,communication patterns ,and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual iniveduals.for degree of doctor of philosophy in counseling psychology. Capeueuniversity.
-Edalati, A. & Redzuan, M. (2010).Pereception of women towards family values and their marital satisfaction.Journal of American science, 6(4), 132-137.
-Esere, M. O., Yeyeodu, A., & Oladun, C. ( 2014). Obstacles and Suggested Solutions to Effective Communication in Marriage as Expressed by Married Adults in Kogi State, Nigeria,journalProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114: 584 – 592.
-Florian,V. Hirschberger, F. & Mikoliner, M. (2013).strivings for romantic intimacy following parther complain or partner eroticism : aterrormangamentperspective. journal of marital & family therapy,22(1),103-119.
-FarmaniShahreza,Sh. Rasuli, M. & GHaedinia, A. (2011).The relationship between marital intimacy, communication patterns of marriage and loving companion - to refrain married employes of university Kharazmi. Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy family,4(3). (In persion)
-Fatehizadeh, M. & Ahmadi, A. (2005).Examine the relationship between communication patterns of marriage and marital satisfaction in university.Journal of family researcher,1(2):110-120.(In persion)
-Frish, M.B. (2006). Quality of life therapy: Applying a life satisfaction pproach to positive psychology and cognitive therapy . John wiley& sons,Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
-Hajiran, H. (2006). Toward a quality of life theory: Net domestic product of happiness. Dictators Research, 75 ,31 -43.
-Halford, K. (2001). Short -term couples therapy. (M.Tabrizi., M, Kardani., F, Jafari) .Tehran: Publications Fararavan.
-Manne,S.L.,Osteroff, J.S., Nortona,T.R., Fox, K. & Glodstein, L. (2006). Cacer–related relationship communication in couples coping with early stage breastcancer ,j.rsycho-oncology .,vol.15,pp.234-247.
-Montgomery, M.J. (2005).psychological intimacy and identity : from early adolescence to emerging adulthood . journal of adolescent research,20:246-374.
-Nazari, A. & Navabinezhad, Sh. (2005).Check recovery program approved dual-career couples' relationship satisfaction. Counseling Research & Developments,4(13):35-59.
-Payot, A., Keith, J. & Barrington, K. (2011). The Quality of Life of Young Children and Infants with Chronic Medical Problems: Review of the Literature. CurrProblPediatrAdolesc Health Care, 41, 91-101.
-Rahimi, M. (2006). Examine the relationship between family communication patterns and quality of life .MA, Shiraz University. (In persion)
-Shiralinia , Kh. (2007). Correlating impact on patterns of communication skills and positive feelings to the wife in a couple of Ahwaz.MA,university of Ahvaz.
-Sudani, M. Dehghani, M. & Dehghanzadeh, Z. (2012). Effectiveness of transactional analysis training to marital dissatisfaction and quality of life for couples.Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy family,2(2). (In persion)
-Zarei, A. & Ahmadi Sarkhuni,T. (2012).The forecast phosphating spiritual intelligence and communication patterns of marital satisfaction with reference to counseling centers in BandarAbbas.Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling,2(2):110-116. (In persion)