فرابینی شاخص‌های شهر یادگیرنده در نواحی شهر یزد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

چکیده

رشد فناوری اطلاعات، نفوذ مشتری‌گرایی، مطرح‌شدن دانش یادگیری از عوامل مؤثر در ایجاد مفهوم شهر یادگیرنده هستند. این تحقیق با هدف فرابینی شاخص‌های شهر یادگیرنده (دانشی، اجتماعی- حقوقی و اقتصادی) در سطح نواحی شهر یزد انجام‌شده است. تحقیق حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی- توسعه‌ای، ازنظر ماهیت و روش توصیفی- تحلیلی و از بعد گرداوری اطلاعات کتابخانه‌ای و اسنادی از نوع پیمایشی است. در این تحقیق از آزمون کلموگروف- اسمیرنف، آزمون T تک نمونه‌ای، همبستگی اسپیرمن و فریدمن بهره گرفته‌شده است. نتایج آزمون کلموگروف- اسمیرنف، نشان داد که توزیع داده‌ها نرمال است. همچنین نتایج آزمون T تک نمونه‌ای، نشان می‌دهد که میانگین شاخص‌ها در نواحی شهر یزد کمتر از مقدار مقایسه شده (3) است و مقدار Tمنفی است. این بدین معنی است که وضعیت شاخص‌های مورد بررسی از نظر خبرگان و کارشناسان در نواحی شهر یزد نامطلوب است. در همبستگی اسپیرمن رابطة متغیر تحصیلات با شاخص دانشی و اقتصادی معنی‌دار و مثبت و رابطة متغیر تحصیلات و شاخص اجتماعی- حقوقی معنی‌دار و منفی است. در آزمون فریدمن، ناحیه 7 بیشترین میانگین را در شاخص دانشی و اقتصادی دارد و ناحیه 6 کمترین میانگین را در شاخص دانشی و اجتماعی- حقوقی دارد. همچنین ناحیه 2 بیشترین میانگین در شاخص اجتماعی- حقوقی و ناحیه 5 کمترین میانگین را در شاخص اقتصادی دارند. این اولویت‌یابی نشان‌دهندة‌ این واقعیت است که در برنامه‌هایی که قرار است برای بالا بردن شاخص‌های شهر یادگیرنده در شهر یزد انجام بگیرد، اولویت با نواحی 5 و 6 است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Review of Learning City Indicators in the areas of Yazd city

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohammadhossein saraei 1
  • shahabagin hajforoush 2
1 Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2 PhD Student Geography and Urban Planning, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Learning and the learning process (interactions between the learner and the social environment) is one of the topics for the development and excellence of today's urban communities.Globalization and economics, the growth of information technology, the transformation of the business world, the influence of customer orientation, the introduction of knowledge and learning as major assets, changing roles and expectations of employees, diversification and mobility of the workforce, rapid change and turmoil are some of the factors that create learning cities. Tensions and skills are constantly changing and growing, and this requires a continuous, quality and universal transfer of knowledge. Explaining the location of each of the main elements of the formation of the learning city in the Yazd city is an issue that can be carefully studied. In this regard, the main purpose of this study is to analyze the situation of Yazd city areas in terms of knowledge, social-legal and economic indicators, learning city and prioritize it and tries to study these indicators of learning city in Yazd city areas to create a learning city and strengthen the learning system. Lifelong for citizens to promote sustainable knowledge given the existing capacities that help to improve the urban environment (landscapes).
Methodology: In this research, the library method, survey documents have been used to collect information. The present research is applied-developmental in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of nature and method. In this research, cluster sampling method has been used. The process of extracting the indicators has been done by fission analysis method. Due to the specialization of the subject, the statistical community includes groups of experts and experts working in organizations related to the concept of the learning city of Yazd (including municipalities, schools, universities, companies, mobilization areas, organizations and libraries). The sample size is estimated based on Cochran sampling method of 320 people and was distributed in the form of a two-dimensional questionnaire in 8 areas of Yazd (according to the population of each district and in proportion to its population) and was cited in the analysis. The validity of the questionnaire was modified and confirmed using the opinions of professors and experts in this field (geography, urban planning, economics, social sciences, urban law and urban management). Cronbach's alpha coefficient to determine the level of reliability of the questionnaire is 0/79%. In order to analyze the collected indices, SPSS software was used and the statistical methods of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-sample t-test, spearman and Friedman correlation were used. Finally, it can be acknowledged that due to cluster sampling and time and place variables that are variable, the present research effort is.
Discussion and Results: In this study, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-sample t-test, Spearman and Friedman correlation were used. The results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the data distribution was normal. Also, the results of one-sample t-test show that the mean of the indicators in the areas of Yazd is less than the compared value (3) and the value of T is negative. This means that the status of the studied indicators is unfavorable for experts in the areas of Yazd. In Spearman correlation, the relationship between education variable and knowledge and economic index is significant and positive, and the relationship between education variable and social-legal index is significant and negative. In Friedman test, area 7 has the highest average in the knowledge and economic index and area 6 has the lowest average in the knowledge and social-legal index. Area 2 also has the highest average in the social-legal index and area 5 has the lowest average in the economic index.
Conclusion: The results of the rankings show that the eight districts of Yazd city each obtained different rankings in knowledge, social-legal and economic indicators. This indicates inequality and significant differences in indicators in some areas. In areas 2 and 7, due to the good quality of life and diverse social context, which has a certain mobility and dynamism in terms of the existence of young people and students and is also part of the new nuclei of the city, is in the first and highest importance and in areas 5 and 6 due to the low standard of living and the lack of a proper culture with urbanization, which lowers the level of perception of people and is also one of the primary and old nuclei of the city, is in the eighth rank and the least important. Therefore, each urban area has its own characteristics according to its type of operation. This prioritization shows the fact that in the programs that are done to raise the indicators of the learning city in Yazd city, the priority is with areas 5 and 6 because these areas have a lower status and the necessary measures should be taken in these areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Learning Organization
  • City Index
  • Learning City
  • Yazd City
- Abbasi, E., Rafiei, L., & Farhadian, H. (2012). Investigating the extent to which the environmental and non-governmental organizations of Tehran have the characteristics of a learning organization, Quarterly Journal of Public Management, Vol. 4, No. 4, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, pp. 53-72. (In Farsi).
- Bayat, S., Gholi, A., & Poor Ezzat, A. A. (2012). Identifying the effective factors in the formation of the learning city in District 6 of Tehran Municipality, Urban Management Quarterly, No. 31, Spring, pp. 139-156. (In Farsi).
- Brahmi, F.A. (2007). Medical Students perceptions of Lifelong learning at Indiana University school of medicine, University of Indiana, pp. 1-117.
- Candy, P. (2003). Life Long learning: critical, desirable or just a good idea, Address to Adult Learning Australia’s Adult learners, week.
- Dekoulou, P., & Trivellas, P. (2015). Measuring the Impact of Learning Organization on Job Satisfaction and Individual Performance in Greek Advertising Sector, Journal: Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 175, pp. 367-375.
- Emami, F., Nezami, A., & Haji Rezaei, S. (2015). Exploring the Meaning and Nature of Learning Cities and Criteria for Measuring the Learning of Cities, International Conference on the Art of Engineering and Law, April, pp. 1-21. (In Farsi).
- Gertler, M.S., & A.Wolf, D. (2004). Local Social Knowledge Management: Community Actors, Institution and Multilevel Governance in Regional Foresight Exercises, Futures, Vol. 36, pp. 45-65.
- Ghiasvand, A., & Abdol Shah, F. (2015). Indicators of Economic Resilience, Trend Quarterly, Year 22, No. 71, autumn, pp. 79-106. (In Farsi).
- Hajforoush, Sh. (2017). Assessment of Learning City Index in the areas of Yazd city, Master Thesis in Geography and Urban Planning, Supervisor: Dr. Mohammad Hossein Saraei, Department of Geography, Yazd University. (In Farsi).
- Haji Aghalo, A. (2005). Learning and its supplements, abstracts of conference papers explaining the position of complementary and extracurricular activities in education, Tehran: Specialized Media Publications, pp. 1-584. (In Farsi).
- Hamilton, R., & Jordan, L. (2011). Learning cities: the United Kingdom experience, Regional Development and Social Cohesion, Jamtli, pp. 193-228.
- Hosseini, S. A., & Gholipour, Y. (2015). Analysis of Islamic Learning Characteristics and Its Relationship with Sustainable Urban Development (Case Study: Rasht City), National Conference on Iranian-Islamic Architecture and Urban Planning, May, pp. 1-15. (In Farsi).
- http:// www.learningcities2015.org
- Institute of Higher Education Research and Planning. (2016). Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (In Farsi).
- Juceviciene, P. (2010). Sustainable Development of the Learning City, European Journal of education, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 419-436.
- Judith, J., Preece, J., & Valdes-Cotera, R. (2018). Entrepreneurial Learning City Regions: How to Grow a Digital Cluster in a City Region, Delivering on the UNESCO 2013, Beijing Declaration on Building Learning Cities, Vol. 10, pp. 379-393.
- Karkeh Abadi, Z., & Alipour, I. (2011). Cities of Knowledge: Approaches, Experiences and Perspectives, Azarakhsh Publications, Tehran. (In Farsi).
- Kearns, P., McDonald, R., Candy, P., Knight, S., & Papadopoulos, G. (1999). Lifelong Learning, VET in the Learning Age: The challenge of Lifelong Learning for All, Volumes 1, 2 and 3, NCVER. South Australia. Anta.
- Kelly, Ch. (2006). Lifelong Learning Strategy for the City of Vancouver, Vancouver Learning City Executive Committee, pp. 1-3.
- Longworth, N. (2006). Learning Cities, Learning Regions, Learning Communities, Lifelong Learning and Local Government, Routledge.
- Ly, K.C., Chen, Z., Wang, S., & Jiang, Y. (2017). The Basel III net stable funding ratio adjustment speed and systemic risk, Journal: Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 39, Part A, pp. 169-182.
- Mohammadi Mehr, M., Maleki, H., Abbaspour, A., & Khoshdel, A. (2011). The Role of Higher Education in Lifelong Learning, Strategic and Education Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 2, Summer, pp. 91-94. (In Farsi).
- Manafi, S., & Ismailpour, N. (2015). An Introduction to the Concept of the Learning City, The First National Conference on Islamic Architecture, Urban Heritage and Sustainable Development, Bahman, Tehran, pp. 1-10. (In Farsi).
- Olivos, P., Santos, A., Martin, S., Canas, M., Gomez-Lazaro, E., & Maya, Y. (2016). The relationship between learning styles and motivation to transfer of learning in a vocational training programme, Journal: Suma Psicologica, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 25-32.
- Pajhvak Shahr. (2012). Successful design of an urban public space, Ahvaz Municipality Internal Journal, No. 12. (In Farsi).
- Performance report. (2016). Yazd Science and Technology Special Zone, July 20. (In Farsi).
- Sarvar, R., Akbari, M., & Taleshi Anbouhi, M. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Factors Affecting the Formation of a Learning City (Case Study: Bonab City), Quarterly Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, Fifth Year, No. 18, Summer, pp. 103-116. (In Farsi).
- Scientific and specialized information center of urban management. (2012). Tehran. (In Farsi).
- Shikshantar. (1999). The People’s Institute for Rethinking Education and Development Udaipur as a Learning City, Draft for Comment of Friday, Udaipur, Rajasthan, pp. 1-9.
- Statistics Center of Iran. (2016). General Census of Influence and Housing, Yazd. (In Farsi).
- Tehran Center for Studies and Planning. (2017). Learning city, Daneshshahr, Shahrivar, No. 441, pp. 5-24. (In Farsi).
- Truong, H. (2016). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities, Journal: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 55, Part B, pp. 1185-1193.